AZ: Palm Valley Phase I residents vote to ban some sex offenders

Level II and III sex offenders are being banished from one Goodyear community after residents voted Dec. 2 to keep them out.

Homeowners voted 185 to 32 in favor of an amendment to Palm Valley Phase I’s declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions that prohibits offenders from living there, said Curtis Ekmark, an attorney representing the homeowners association. Full Article

Related

http://www.hoaleader.com/public/Arizona-HOA-Changes-Rules-No-Sex-Offenders-or-Felons-Part-1.cfm

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Lawsuit on the way from Janice !!!!! That development will soon feel what it is like to be STUCK with a cactus where the sun doesn’t shine ! LOL

And people think this is okay because….?

I just watched Highlander last night. Not the Adrian Paul crap, or the inane “Highlander 2,” which I simply choose to believe never existed, but the Chris Lambert version with the Queen soundtrack. When I saw this post, all I could think of was the scene where Connor was banished from his village tied to a stock. Hey, he got off light. If the villagers had their way, they would have burned him.

So…how is this particular little vote any different?

See, this is why I don’t agree with a tiered registry. We’d just see more discrimination against Tier II and III offenders. Most of us, about 90,000 of us, would end up as Tier II or III under a tiered scam.

The one (1) lone person was known by the victims, which seems to be lost on the voting populace……ignorant people…..can’t think to make a rational decision and don’t recognize the statistics

The people who voted for this represent the scum of America. They need to get out of my country. They deserve every terrorist attack that they get.

One good aspect about nonsense like this is that it allows good people to see who the scumbags are so we can keep them away from us.

Unfortunately I’m seeing this happen more and more with HOA’s (which I already disliked before for other reasons).

http://blogs.athomenet.com/sex-offenders-should-hoas-ban/

My wife and I purchased a home about 1 1/2 years back. The very first thing I demanded from my realtor:
“I will not live in a home with any HOA. Period.” Those who live in home with a HOA can enjoy their prison.

I’m with you. Don’t know why someone would want to have another layer of people telling them what to do. Especially when the rules make no sense, other than to keep things the inverse of diverse… My father in law’s association told him he HAD to have an H2O sucking lawn, no water frugal flowers allowed, right in the middle of our most severe drought in decades. It is to keep up appearances, they say. They can have those appearances. It’s not for me. It just makes everthing chant the same soul crushing brand of big box hardware store ticky tacky, with a paucity of resonance and range, both inside and out, animal, vegetable, mineral and human.

Didn’t the SCOTUS 2003 decision denote that registration wouldn’t affect occupations or housing?

So… about that…